Serial Key Dust Settle -

| Attempts (log2) | KL Divergence (bits) | |----------------|----------------------| | 0 | 8.000 | | 10 | 7.998 | | 20 | 7.125 | | 30 | 3.210 | | 34 | 0.008 (< ε) |

No prior work has quantified how long (in terms of computational steps or guesses) it takes for this dust to settle. This paper fills that gap. 2. Formal Model 2.1 Key Representation Let a serial key be a string ( K = k_1 k_2 \ldots k_n ) where each ( k_i \in \Sigma ), ( |\Sigma| = 32 ) (alphanumeric excluding ambiguous chars). Total keyspace size ( N = 32^n ). 2.2 Partial Disclosure Event An attacker learns a set of positions ( P \subset 1,\ldots,n ) and their values. Let ( U = 1,\ldots,n \setminus P ) be the unknown positions. Before any attack, entropy ( H(K) = n \log_2 32 ). After disclosure, conditional entropy: serial key dust settle

Software licensing, entropy decay, partial key disclosure, brute-force resistance, key space settlement. 1. Introduction Serial keys (e.g., XXXXX-XXXXX-XXXXX-XXXXX ) are typically 20–25 alphanumeric characters, offering between 80 and 120 bits of entropy. However, real-world attacks rarely brute-force the entire space. Instead, an attacker may incrementally discover segments: for instance, they acquire the first 8 bits via a debugger leak, or they observe that a valid key starts with "A1B2C". | Attempts (log2) | KL Divergence (bits) |

where ( P_t ) is the attacker’s belief after ( t ) failed attempts. The ( T_s ) is the smallest ( t ) such that ( D(t) < \epsilon ) (e.g., ( \epsilon = 10^-6 ) bits). 3. Main Theorem: Exponential Dust Decay Theorem 1 (Exponential Settling). For a serial key with ( m ) unknown symbols and no validation bias (uniformly valid completions), the dust settles according to: Formal Model 2

[ H(K | K_P) = |U| \log_2 32 ]

Future work: Extend model to quantum brute-force attacks and side-channel induced non-uniform priors. [1] T. Warez, "On the entropy of software keys," J. Cryptography , vol. 12, 2019. [2] L. Censor, "Partial information disclosure in product activation," IEEE S&P , 2022. [3] A. Attacker, "Dust settling in reduced keyspaces," Black Hat Briefings , 2023. If instead you meant something entirely different by "serial key dust settle" (e.g., a literal physical process of dust settling on a hardware serial key, or a term from a specific software tool), please clarify, and I will rewrite the paper accordingly.

in the ideal case. However, due to checksum or validation constraints (e.g., a Luhn-like algorithm), the distribution over ( K_U ) may be biased. Define the dust ( D(t) ) at discrete time ( t ) (number of brute-force attempts) as the Kullback-Leibler divergence from the uniform distribution over valid completions: