Mariz de Oliveira represented the Daniel family, specifically the mayor’s brother, José Daniel, who believed the official investigation was a whitewash. The attorney pushed for reopening the case, filed suits against police for negligence, and demanded access to sealed intelligence files. In 2020, he succeeded in having a new task force appointed. While no definitive culprit has been convicted, Mariz de Oliveira’s persistence kept the case alive.
“He is neither,” wrote political commentator Renata Agostini. “He is a defense attorney. That is all. He does not ask a client’s political color before accepting a retainer. In a polarized age, that makes him both admirable and monstrous, depending on your angle.” Those who have watched him in court describe a man who never raises his voice. Mariz de Oliveira is tall, soft-spoken, and dressed in conservative dark suits. His weapons are paper—reams of motions, citations from German and Italian jurisprudence, dissents from the European Court of Human Rights. He treats a criminal hearing like a chess endgame: slow, meticulous, punishing of any procedural misstep.
“Carlos lost the war, but he won several battles that will help future defendants,” said criminal law expert Fernando Hideo. “He forced Lava Jato to tighten its chain of custody. That is a legacy.” One of the longest-running threads in Mariz de Oliveira’s career is the unsolved killing of Celso Daniel, the mayor of Santo André (São Paulo state) and a rising star of the Workers’ Party (PT). Daniel was kidnapped and murdered in 2002. For nearly two decades, the case languished, plagued by false leads and allegations that the PT itself had covered up links to organized crime. carlos mariz de oliveira teixeira .pdf
His critics say he has laundered reputations for oligarchs. His admirers say he has kept the flame of due process alive through two dictatorships (military and populist) and one anti-corruption frenzy.
Critics howled. After defending center-right figures (Maia, Cabral) and working for a left-wing family (Daniel), Mariz de Oliveira was now tied to the far right. Was he an ideologue or an opportunist? While no definitive culprit has been convicted, Mariz
Legal scholars point to these cases as illustrations of Mariz de Oliveira’s signature move: he does not necessarily prove innocence; he proves the state’s case is inadmissible. “He is a defender of the cathedral,” wrote law professor Juliana Bello in a 2018 analysis. “He believes that if the state violates its own rules, even a guilty person must walk free. That is not cynicism. That is classical liberalism applied to criminal law.” If the Maia cases made Mariz de Oliveira a regional name, the Sérgio Cabral affair made him a national lightning rod. Cabral, the former governor of Rio de Janeiro (2007–2014), was arrested in 2016 as the central figure in “Operation Car Wash” ( Lava Jato ), the largest corruption probe in Brazilian history. Prosecutors alleged Cabral led a criminal organization that extracted over R$200 million in bribes from construction companies.
“He taught me that a prosecutor’s narrative is not evidence,” Maia would later say in a rare public thanks. “Carlos dismantles stories, not just facts.” The attorney-client relationship with Maia would span two decades. When Maia became governor of Rio de Janeiro (2007–2010), new corruption allegations emerged involving overbilling in infrastructure contracts. Again, Mariz de Oliveira stepped in. And again, he won acquittals or dismissals in multiple cases, often on technical grounds: expired statutes of limitation, illegally obtained wiretaps, or lack of direct evidence. That is all
He earned his law degree from the Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) and quickly added a master’s in criminal procedure from the Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Fluent in English, Spanish, and French, he also obtained a license to practice in Portugal, giving him a transatlantic reach rare among Brazilian litigators. By the late 1980s, he had co-founded the firm that would become Mariz de Oliveira & Sociedade de Advogados, known for taking cases that other firms refused—often on principle.