• PRODUCTS (8)
  • CATALOGUES

  • WHITE PAPERS

  • PRESS RELEASES

  • Suggested offers
  • 0 results. Did you mean ?
  • Suggested categories
  • 0 results. Did you mean ?
  • Suggested companies
  • 0 results. Did you mean ?
  • Suggested offers
  • 0 results. Did you mean ?
  • Suggested categories
  • 0 results. Did you mean ?
  • Suggested companies
  • 0 results. Did you mean ?
Become a supplier
Help
My account

Boss Ce-2 Analysis [FAST]

The SN 1200xx was the clincher. He traced the serial number. It was manufactured in March 1981, shipped to a music store in Hollywood, and purchased by the plaintiff’s guitarist on April 12th. The album was recorded in June.

He attached the spectrograms, the BBD chip analysis, and the scanned engineer’s note. Then, as a personal touch—something Kara had taught him—he added a single line at the bottom: boss ce-2 analysis

Leo’s job was to prove or disprove the chain of custody. Was the chorus on that album from a Boss CE-2, as the plaintiff claimed, or was it a studio trick—a Roland JC-120 amp’s built-in chorus, or even a later digital emulation? The SN 1200xx was the clincher

The evidence was a single audio file: “Exhibit_7_CE-2.wav.” It was a thirty-second guitar riff, clean and crisp at first, then blooming into something watery and lush. A chorus effect. The legal case was a multi-million dollar dispute between two legacy rock bands over who “owned” the sound of a landmark album from 1981. One side claimed the other had digitally recreated their guitarist’s “unique analog warmth” for a reunion tour, infringing on a newly filed “sound signature” patent. The album was recorded in June

Buyers

Find your suppliers Complete your request and let our teams find you the best deals available.

Suppliers

Find your future clients List your products and services to enhance your web presence and receive qualified enquiries.